ElectriPlast: In a Holding Pattern until 25 June 2013...
Well, the picture pretty much tells the story -- but there is more to this tale according to Integral's last minute announcement as offered below...
Continue Watching this Space!
PK sends...
+++++++++
Integral Technologies Moves Conference Call to June 25, 2013 Due to Recent Positive Corporate Developments
BELLINGHAM, Wash.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Integral Technologies, Inc. (OTCBB: ITKG), a pioneer in conductive hybrid plastics, announced today that it is moving its conference call originally scheduled for Tuesday, June 11, 2013 at 4:30 PM EDT to Tuesday, June 25, 2013 at 4:30 PM EDT.
"We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause but we have had some significant positive developments of late and we feel it will be a far more informative call if we delay it until June 25," said Doug Bathauer, Integral's CEO.
Anyone that has a specific topic or question they wish to be addressed on this call, please submit to: ikginquiry@itkg.net.
To join the conference call, use the dial-in information below. When prompted, ask for the "Integral Technologies Call".
Date: 06/25/2013
Time: 4:30 PM Eastern
Conference Line Dial-In (US): 877-407-8133
International Dial-In: 201-689-8040
Conference ID#: 415004
Dial in at least 10 minutes before the call to ensure timely participation. A telephone replay of the call will be available through July 7, 2013. To access the replay:
Replay Dial-In (US): 877-660-6853
International Dial-In: 201-612-7415
Conference ID#: 415004
Safe Harbor Statement
This press release contains "forward-looking statements'' within the meaning of Section 27A of the 1933 Securities Act and Section 21E of the 1934 Securities Exchange Act. These statements include, without limitation, predictions and guidance relating to the company's future financial performance and the research, development and commercialization of its technologies. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as, "may," "should," "expects," "plans," "anticipates," "believes," "estimates," "predicts," "potential," "continue," or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements are based on management's current expectations, but they involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Actual results and the timing of events could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements, as the result of such factors, risks and uncertainties as:
(1) competition in the markets for the products and services sold by the company,
(2) the ability of the company to execute its plans,
(3) other factors detailed in the company's public filings with the SEC, including, without limitation, those described in the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and available at http://www.sec.gov, and
(4) the parties may be unable to agree upon definitive agreements. You are urged to consider these factors carefully in evaluating the forward-looking statements.
posted by PK... | 6/12/2013 02:43:00 PM
21 Comments:
My, my, my. So it WAS a "forward looking statement". Good thing I asked. Ha, ha.
"These forward-looking statements are based on management's current expectations, but they involve a number of risks and uncertainties."
So what can we expect on the 25th? An actual conversation as PK seems to expect? An open forum? Or a one-way, we talk, you listen, exchange. Or will the amended current expectation slide into the rear view mirror as did the original?
I guess you will just have to wait to find out.
Therein resides the "Big Reveal", conversation and all...
Yes, I actually believe, and expect one reveal among many is on the verge of taking place...
PK - are you going to be a part of this dialogue? If so, will you post your impressions afterwards?
No, this time, I'll take part.
We've had folks checking in with their sources. While nothing definative has come up, one trusted touchstone has noted their excitement.
In general, there isna positive impression behind the scenes. While the news to be shared will not be all sugar-laced, the salty bits (something that's been mulled over for the past 3 weeks) won't be an intolerable deal breaker --
While the folks at corporate Integral are strong-arming leaks, as time and interest builds, something is more likely than not to break loose. When it does, we'll be talkin, as-opposed-to-sharinimpressions will be the rule of the day...
PK sends...
PK-
What is, "sugar-laced with salty bits" mean or have to do with contracts, licensing agreements, future production and new patents?
Honestly, I do not think you know anything of substance nor do you have any clear or foggy insights. You lie dormant with nary a word during the last 6+ months and now when there is major share appreciation and action, you jump up out of your Baverian sleep and pretend that you and your sources, "Know Things". No disrespect to you but you know absolutely nothing. Just guessing and assessing some public data and perhaps some weak word of mouth hearsay conjecture that Vince has dreamed up.
I want this company and product to succeed more then anything as I too am deeply invested. But please go back to sleep until hard news is released and then you can use your data interpretation skills to thoroughly analyze what is publicly released from Integral. Until then, no offense again, the rest of your salty & sweet banter is complete speculative or imagined bullsh*t
Look at this, I note that I will participate in the discussion, and then – in a put-up or shut-up fashion, I'm baited disclose all, and poorly baited at that.
Share, or go back to your rock in Bavaria and crawl under it.
Despite the agenda behind that last post, there is no really offense to be taken on this point. This has been a tough investment for many. The people within the Integral Corp and the ElectriPlast product itself have been working for the past year-plus, in an effort to emerge from and surpass an international ‘austerity’ mindset. Fast-forward to the present here & now...with an announcement days away.
Aside from the “Anonymous” individual who for some reason can't spell the word "bullshit" correctly, I stand by what I noted in my last.
If/when something definitive emerges I will discuss and be part of the dialog. What I won't do is share conversations held by the DD-group, or exchanges with sources that could possibly jeopardize current/future access..
As for Vince's participation, and your attempt at slamming him in your diatribe, on this--I DO TAKE OFFENSE... I stand firm in noting that Vince S. has more integrity, character, creative intellect and grace than you could begin to imagine. We—collectively—are lucky to have him as the EB Editor-in-Chief, and on a personal note, I am proud to call him a true friend.
Lets put this in perspective...
"While nothing definative has come up, one trusted touchstone has noted their excitement."
Then...."What I won't do is share conversations held by the DD-group, or exchanges with sources that could possibly jeopardize current/future access."
Much ado about nothing it would seem. Noted??? An opinion about "their" excitement? But I won`t tell you who "their" they are. The simple fact is that all DD begins and ends at a strip mall office in Bellingham, Wa. From the lips of the people who have the most to gain from it. The same ones that will not go on record unless they have a safe harbor statement to protect them. I expect nothing less from the over hyped conference call.
It`s deja vu all over again. The pumpers have been pushing some form of this empty line for 12 long years. The result.....zero production contracts, zero production revenue.
PK, as you know there are many of us out here that do not agree with the prior poster. As an investor for over 10 years I've had high levels of frustration as well, but the prior poster's frustration is completely misguided. I can't say what this individuals investment experience is but frankly he or she doesn't seem to be able to recognize the beginning of a positive turn around for a company if it was spelled out and written on their face.
Maybe its too hard for some to believe given how long it has taken (thank you for that Bill). Prior management was silent for too long and now we know why, they just could not get the job done. During the silent time we had this blog for open communication, so I don't quite understand the attack on you. That said, let's hope we get some good news soon and that certain individuals learn to point their personal frustrations in the appropriate direction.
to the first 6/18 poster: Thank you for that. There are many times when i wonder why I bother to read this blog, because of the inanity and nastiness of a few of the posters. Anyone who plays this game ought to understand its rules - you place your money with an understanding of the risks involved. If you feel grievously misled, cash out and heal your ego. The rest of us are not interested in indulging in your toxicity.
Wah, wah, wah. Dontcha hate it when someone rains on your parade. You come to these boards to blow smoke up each others behinds for the benefit of the investing public. Playing the spin game. You try to turn carefully worded innuendo and forward looking statements into insider gosphel. What you don`t claim to know, you claim to know some nameless other that does. Show me a revenue producing contract. Show me a SEC filing containing production based income.
Understand the rules? What rules? Hope and change aren`t rules. Boy, haven`t we all learned that lately. If that`s your investing style, so be it. You`re the one that has to live with it. But hey, let`s try to keep the discussion on company issues, not investment styles.
You're not 'raining on my parade," you're just wasting my time.
Incoming...
I think I saw the poster (June 15 @ 5.18pm) carried out of the AAPL stock holders meeting by the security guards after his huge disruption DEMANDING a very large dividend be issued to him. He was in a total tizzy, interrupted every speaker to his own agenda. It was ugly.
tomorrow should be fun to watch...
It is always fun to watch the "dump" after the "pump".
As always, they've done a masterful job serving their own purposes: providing a tidy sell window for holders of their warrants. And, as always, there's still no evidence of a sale.
And back to the $0.30's we go...
Looks like Doug's discussion of ITKG's business model was lost on the old timers....
I wonder if the old management did so much damage to the LL's that there will never be a trust restored. On some level I can understand the mentality of only focusing on the bad (no revenue - right now) and just getting out of the stock completely.
That said, a buying opportunity seems to be knocking. I think there is a real chance the tide has turned for ITKG. For the record, I'm not telling anyone else to buy. However, in my world licensing agreements are a big deal and when they are associated with customer relationships they can add significant value to a company. If the agreements result in revenues there will be huge upside potential and it won't be long before ITKG gets gobbled up IMO.
Business models, relationships, joint developments, new management teams and contracts with no revenue - its got everyone breathing heavy, hopeful and starry-eyed. They're talking "tip of the iceberg" and acquisition now. All without a pound sold in 10+ years.
Focusing on the revenue is focusing on the fundamental that somewhere, somehow, someone has to be willing to pay real money for a significant quantity of this material. Sure, "it works" - making it nothing more than a laboratory curiosity. The patent office is jammed with inventions that have insufficient value to commercialize and this is just one more.
People are highly suspicious because after all these years and all this hype, no one has been able to complete a single commercial product development. Not even a small, niche seed development of any kind. The material is just not commercially viable.
your thinking is over five years old. It was correct thinking back then, but not so now.
I will stand corrected and eat my words if you can tell me that you are employed by a company that has in fact tested Electriplast. Even if you were is it possible it just wasn't viable for your specific application?
C'mon man, are you really 100% sure it isn't viable after two (very large) companies agreed to work with Integral. Think very hard before you answer that question.
Despite what you think now, you'll get the real answer soon.
Soon? (I can't believe you used that word!)
No. The only thing we'll get soon are more plans, promises and potential. And maybe a few more agreements.
100% sure? Maybe 99% - I suppose pigs could fly someday. This product has had a crack sales force, top notch engineering and development team, dozens of patents, wide exposure (350+ NDAs) and manufacturing capability for years. But, for some unknown reason, they have not been able to launch a single commercial application. Not even a small, niche product. Nothing.
Why do you suppose that is? Because they didn't have a big enough customer like Delphi or Hanwha? Don't forget, GE, Lear and some large auto companies all had a shot at this.
No. The only thing left is that the product isn't viable. Its either too expensive, too hard to make and use or its just a solution without a problem. No one cares. And no one is likely to care soon, either.
Your point is well taken, and as an LL I've felt the pain and frustration you have. Here's the thing (just my opinion here) the companies you mentioned are U.S. companies. In the past our country was the first to adopt and embraced new technology. Sadly, this attitude has changed over time. Probably a combination of fear, laziness, litigation, etc. So the first company to sign is in South Korea. Delphi has global operations and I'm guessing that they signed because another company signed first. I'm also guessing that the first products rolled out with Electriplast won't be sold in the U.S. I believe this will be the case as these multi-billion dollar companies will want to mitigate risk. If things go smoothly, we'll the products here in the U.S. Again, only my opinion here. It has taken a long time, but what was to be accomplished was no small task and should not be underestimated.
Post a Comment
<< Home